Experience of Grace #9 - Humble Gratitude

Description

In Romans 9:1–33, Mike Chilcoat reframes one of Scripture's most challenging chapters — showing that God's sovereignty over Israel's story is not a reason for confusion but for praise. If you've wrestled with predestination or grace, this message offers clarity and a reminder: the invitation to know God through Jesus is wide open to everyone.

 

Summary & Application

Romans 9 has a reputation. Most Christians who've spent time in Bible study have heard it described as "the hard chapter" — the one that raises uncomfortable questions about predestination, divine election, and whether God plays favorites. Mike walked into that reputation head-on in a recent message from our Experience of Grace series, and offered a perspective that may shift the way you read this passage entirely.

Setting the Stage

To understand Romans 9, Mike opened with a panoramic view of the first eleven chapters of Romans. Chapters 1–4 address justification — freedom from the penalty of sin through Christ's sacrifice. Chapters 5–8 address sanctification — the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit renewing us from the inside out. Beginning in chapter 9, Paul turns to a third major theme: God's sovereignty — specifically, how that sovereignty has operated throughout the story of Israel.

That distinction matters, because it shapes everything that follows.

The Question Paul Is Actually Answering

Here is the central reframe Mike offered: Romans 9 is almost universally read as a chapter about individual salvation and predestination. But as Mike walked through the passage's logic — its context within Romans, the audience Paul was writing to, and the Old Testament stories Paul chose to cite — a different subject comes into view. Paul is primarily addressing Israel's national status before God, not the individual eternal destinies of specific people.

The pastoral problem Paul is answering: if Jesus is the fulfillment of God's covenant promises, and if ethnic Israel largely rejected him, does that mean God's word has failed? Jesus himself had warned that the kingdom of God would be "taken away" from those who rejected him and "given to a people who will produce its fruit" (Matthew 21:43). Paul does not treat this as a contradiction of God's faithfulness — he treats it as evidence of it.

Romans 9:6 anchors the argument: "It is not as though God's word had failed." The covenant promise was never simply that every physical descendant of Abraham would receive it by default. It was always more specific, always working through God's sovereign choice, always maintained by grace rather than bloodline or effort.

Five Old Testament Stories, One Argument

To make his case, Paul works through five Old Testament examples of God's sovereign choice at the national level. Two receive the most attention.

The first is Isaac and Ishmael. Abraham had two sons, but the promise passed through Isaac — not because of anything Isaac did, but because of God's sovereign grace and his promise to Abraham. Theologian Norman Geisler has observed that "even though Israel as a nation was elect, nonetheless each individual had to accept God's grace by faith in order to be saved." National election and individual salvation are related, but they are not the same thing.

The second is Jacob and Esau. God announced his choice before either twin was born — before either had done anything good or bad (Romans 9:11). Mike was careful here: this is not God arbitrarily deciding the eternal fate of two individuals. It is God declaring which of two nations he will work through to fulfill his redemptive plan. Genesis 25:23 is explicit: "Two nations are in your womb." The hard phrase "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated" (v. 13) is better translated as "favored more than" — a construction that appears in comparable form in Luke 14:26. This is the language of national priority, not individual condemnation.

Two Oars in the Water

This is where the larger theological tension surfaces — one Romans 9 has provoked for centuries. Mike named it directly: the Bible clearly teaches both God's sovereignty and human free will, and the honest response to that tension is not to resolve it artificially in one direction.

He used the image of a rowboat with two oars. Lean too hard on one — insisting that human choice is everything and God has no ultimate control — and you veer off course. Lean too hard on the other — insisting that God's sovereignty leaves no meaningful room for human response — and you veer the other way. Staying in the current requires holding both.

Most of the teaching staff at Orchard Hill, Mike acknowledged, land in the Reformed Calvinist tradition. But he was equally clear that this is not a license for arrogance. Charles and John Wesley, representing the Arminian tradition, were ministers of extraordinary faithfulness and fruitfulness. "That kind of arrogance," Mike said of theological tribalism, "does not bring about the righteous life that God desires."

Perhaps the most honest framing is this: "God is sovereign, and he chose to give us choice." We trust that God sees in full what we see only in part.

The Invitation Is Wide Open

Whatever your convictions about election and predestination, the New Testament speaks with unambiguous clarity about one thing: the invitation to know God through Jesus Christ is open to anyone who wants to receive it.

Mike closed with three passages. Second Peter 3:9 says God is "patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance." First Timothy 2:3–4 says God "wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth." And John 3:16 — perhaps the most widely known verse in the Bible — says God gave his Son so that "whoever believes in him will not perish, but have eternal life."

That word whoever is not incidental. It is the whole point. God's sovereignty over the history of nations does not narrow the invitation — it grounds it and guarantees it. He is not simply powerful enough to save; he actively desires to.

That, Mike said, is something worth praising God for.

For Reflection

  1. What posture do you tend to bring when you encounter a passage of Scripture that feels difficult or unsettling — and how might "humble gratitude" for God's ways, even the parts you don't fully understand, reshape that posture?

  2. How does the distinction between God's sovereign strategy for nations and his open invitation to individuals through Jesus change how you've thought about this chapter — or about the relationship between sovereignty and grace more broadly?


This post was developed with the assistance of artificial intelligence based on the sermon "Humble Gratitude" by Mike Chilcoat (Romans 9:1–33, June 13–14, 2026). While every effort has been made to faithfully represent the content and intent of the original message, readers are encouraged to engage the full sermon audio or transcript for the complete teaching.

Mike Chilcoat

Mike Chilcoat​ is the Young Life Regional Director of the Keystone Region in Pennsylvania. He is married to Kimie who has led Young Life since 1994 and now serves as the Keystone Regional Administrator. They have 3 daughters.

Previous
Previous

When Life Doesn’t Make Sense

Next
Next

Thoughts That Shape Us